Today, on November 18, 2025, Cloudflare experienced a serious outage tied to its Hong Kong data center. This disruption caused a spike in internal server errors (HTTP 500) across multiple high-profile websites. The outage has sparked widespread concern, as many digital services rely on Cloudflare’s global network to distribute traffic efficiently. We are examining what went wrong, how it affected performance, and what downstream legal or regulatory risks may now be spotlighted.
Cloudflare confirms that during scheduled maintenance at its Hong Kong facility, engineers inadvertently added outbound BGP routes to the inbound interface. These erroneous routes caused upstream providers to route global traffic to the offline data center.
The misannouncement propagated via BGP, redirecting traffic to a node that was intentionally shut down for upgrades. This created a “blackhole” effect for roughly 15 minutes until the error was detected and corrected.
Cloudflare estimates that ~25% of its inbound traffic comes from direct peers, which were less impacted. However, for the rest of the network, especially upstream-connected sources, the impact was significant. Many users and platforms reported internal server errors, site loading failures, and API breakdowns during the outage.
This shows that even highly resilient CDN networks are not immune to human error during maintenance.
Several high-traffic platforms reported disruptions, including X (formerly Twitter), ChatGPT, and content-heavy sites like Canva. Users on Reddit confirmed widespread outages, reporting "Internal Server Error" messages and inability to access common tools.
In Pakistan, local digital media and services like Dawn.com, Samaa.tv, and even developer platforms saw significant disruptions.
Invalid routing caused a surge in requests that went to a data center that was intentionally offline. This created a bottleneck, increasing error rates. During the 15-minute glitch, a large slice of the global inbound requests could not be processed normally. The fallout also included degraded performance on Cloudflare’s Dashboard, API, and support portal, further slowing incident identification. There are many users asking questions on reddit about cloudflare servers down.
Taken together, this interruption underscores how a single misconfiguration in a critical data center can ripple into a major global traffic event.
Many Cloudflare customers operate under Service Level Agreements (SLAs). A routing failure like this might trigger requests for credits or refunds, depending on contract terms. For enterprise-level clients, such events can trigger breach discussions or renegotiation.
Lawmakers and regulators might see this as a risk: when critical internet infrastructure fails, it can disrupt communications, commerce, or even emergency services. For Cloudflare, this raises questions about governance and resilience. Misrouting of BGP announcements could be framed as a network stability risk, which may prompt regulatory scrutiny, especially in jurisdictions with strict telecom or data‑infrastructure rules.
Cloudflare already notes it will implement a “verification layer” for routing changes and more stringent checks with upstream providers. Legally, firms may press for more robust guarantees or redundancy clauses in their contracts.
There’s growing unease among developers and operators who depend heavily on Cloudflare. On Reddit, multiple users expressed frustration:
Another user speculated about decentralizing infrastructure after this “outage cascade.”
While Cloudflare is private, such sentiment could influence future public‑market backers or impact enterprise deals. Investors in web infrastructure providers will likely watch closely to gauge how Cloudflare recovers and what safeguards it adds.
The Cloudflare outage on November 18 exposed how even global backbone networks can fail catastrophically due to a routing mistake. This event not only disrupted high-profile services like X and ChatGPT, but also raised serious legal and SLA‑liability concerns. For organizations relying on Cloudflare, it's a warning to reassess their risk exposure, especially when one provider handles a substantial portion of traffic. For Cloudflare itself, the incident underscores the need for tighter operational controls, stronger contract protections, and transparency with clients. Going forward, both customers and regulators may demand more robust guarantees against such systemic risks.
It failed because during maintenance, engineers mistakenly announced outbound BGP routes on the inbound interface. These mis‑announcements caused upstream networks to believe that the offline Hong Kong node was the correct destination, even though it was shut for upgrades.
Businesses may invoke SLA clauses for credit or refunds if their contracts guarantee a certain uptime. Also, this outage may trigger scrutiny of Cloudflare’s operational risk and resilience, potentially influencing regulatory compliance in critical infrastructure sectors.
Cloudflare plans to implement a “route verification layer” that double-checks BGP changes before they are announced. It is also coordinating with upstream providers to put in place additional safeguards so that erroneous announcements don’t propagate unchecked.
Given this event, diversification makes sense for risk-sensitive organizations. Enterprises may evaluate hybrid CDN strategies, multi-provider setups, or backup routing to reduce single‑provider dependency.
Get exclusive New Trends and Details Right in Your Inbox
.svg)
.svg)